推进器辐射声场有源控制试验研究

刘阔阔; 孙红灵; 孙陆阳; 李世洵; 程晓斌; 李玉慧; 曹容宁; 王晗

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0034

推进器辐射声场有源控制试验研究

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0034

刘阔阔^{1, 2,},
孙红灵^{1, 2,},
孙陆阳^{1, 2, ,},
李世洵^{1, 2,},
程晓斌^{1, 2,},
李玉慧^1,,
曹容宁^1,,
王晗^1,

1.
中国科学院声学研究所, 北京, 100190
2.
中国科学院大学, 北京, 100049

基金项目: 国家自然基金青年基金(12304525).

详细信息

作者简介:
刘阔阔(1994-), 男, 博士, 工程师, 研究方向为有源噪声与振动控制

通讯作者:
孙陆阳(1987-), 男, 博士, 副研究员, 研究方向为有源噪声与振动控制.

计量
- 文章访问数: 13
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2026-01-30
- 修回日期: 2026-03-04
- 录用日期: 2026-03-16
- 网络出版日期: 2026-03-30

Experimental Study on Active Control for Propeller Radiated Sound Fields

LIU Kuokuo^{1, 2
,},
SUN Hongling^{1, 2
,},
SUN Luyang^{1, 2
, ,},
LI Shixun^{1, 2
,},
CHENG Xiaobin^{1, 2
,},
LI Yuhui^1
,,
CAO Rongning^1
,,
WANG Han^1
,

1.
Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

摘要

摘要: 水下航行器航行时, 推进器会产生明显的低频线谱辐射噪声。为了验证不同有源控制策略对线谱辐射噪声的控制效果, 首次在实际小型推进器上开展了辐射声场有源控制试验研究。搭建包含推进器、传感器、次级力源、次级声源及控制系统的水下试验平台, 分别进行有源噪声控制、有源振动控制以及有源声振复合控制试验。通过改变推进器工况, 测试不同控制策略对推进器水下辐射噪声的抑制效果。结果表明: 有源噪声控制对推进器低频线谱噪声抑制效果显著且稳定, 在高转速工况下效果最好; 有源振动控制效果具有局限性, 局部控制可能导致声场重构; 有源声振复合控制在部分工况下展现出协同控制潜力, 但需进一步优化控制策略与协同机制。研究成果为水下推进器辐射噪声有源控制的工程化提供了试验依据和技术支撑。
- 推进器声场 /
- 有源控制 /
- 复合控制 /
- 控制策略 /
- 水下噪声
Abstract: When an underwater vehicle is in motion, the propeller will generate significant low-frequency line spectrum radiation noise. To verify the control effectiveness of different active control strategies on the line spectrum radiation noise, an active control experiment on the radiation acoustic field was conducted for the first time on a real small-scale propeller. An underwater test platform, which includes a propeller, sensors, secondary force actuators, secondary sound sources, and a control system, was constructed for active noise control(ANC), active vibration control(AVC), and active noise and vibration control(ANVC) tests. By altering the working conditions of the propeller, the suppression effects of different control strategies on the underwater radiated sound pressure of the propeller were tested. The results show that active noise control has a significant and stable effect on suppressing the low-frequency line spectrum noise of the propeller, and performs best under high rotational speed conditions; active vibration control has limitations and local control may lead to sound field reconstruction; active acoustic-vibration combined control shows potential for collaborative control in some operating conditions, but the control strategy and collaborative mechanism need to be further optimized. The research results provide an experimental basis and technical support for the engineering control of underwater propeller radiated noise.
- Propeller acoustic field /
- Active control /
- Hybrid control /
- Control strategy /
- Underwater noise

HTML全文

图 1 试验系统总体框图

Figure 1. Overall block diagram of the test system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 水下测试现场

Figure 2. Underwater test site

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 水密加速度计

Figure 3. The waterproof accelerometer

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 水听器监测点布置示意图

Figure 4. Layout diagram of hydrophone monitoring points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 有源控制算法框图

Figure 5. Block diagram of the active control algorithm

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 有源控制系统及数据采集设备

Figure 6. Active control system and data acquisition equipment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 高转速工况下监测点频谱图

Figure 7. Spectrum diagram of monitoring points under high-speed operating conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 高转速工况不同控制策略下降噪量对比

Figure 8. Comparison of noise reduction under high-speed operating conditions with different control strategies

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 中转速工况下监测点频谱图

Figure 9. Spectrum diagram of monitoring points under medium-speed operating conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 中转速工况不同控制策略下降噪量对比

Figure 10. Comparison of noise reduction under middle-speed operating conditions with different control strategies

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 低转速工况下开启AVC前后监测点频谱图

Figure 11. Spectrum diagram of monitoring points under low-speed operating conditions before and after activating AVC

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 低转速工况不同控制策略下降噪量对比

Figure 12. Comparison of noise reduction under low-speed operating conditions with different control strategies

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 高转速工况下不同控制策略下降噪量

Table 1. Noise reduction under different control strategies at high-speed operating conditions

名称 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8

ANC 15.2 15.7 13.7 14.1 16.4 17.9 13.6 15

AVC 0.2 0.1 0.3 −1.1 -2.6 −1.3 0 0

ANVC 4.9 2.4 5.7 9.9 5.8 8.6 9.7 9.5

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 中转速工况下不同控制策略下降噪量

Table 2. Noise reduction under different control strategies at medium-speed operating conditions dB

名称 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8

ANC 11.4 7.2 7.4 5.7 4.7 7.4 9.0 9.7

AVC −0.4 −0.8 −0.3 −0.4 −0.3 −0.1 0.3 −0.1

ANVC 12.6 5.2 5.6 12.1 9.3 10.8 5.5 14.4

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 低转速工况下不同控制策略下降噪量

Table 3. Noise reduction under different control strategiesat low-speed operating conditions dB

名称 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8

ANC 易发散

AVC 7.1 14 3.6 1.3 0.5 −0.2 −0.8 7.9

ANVC 易发散

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(14)

[1]	宋超, 刘瑞杰, 郑伟伟, 等. 国外水下无人移动装备综合隐身技术研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2021, 43(10): 186-189. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2021.10.038 Song C, Liu R J, Zheng W W, et al. Research on comprehensive stealth technology of foreign underwater unmanned mobile equipment[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2021, 43(10): 186-189. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2021.10.038
[2]	谢基榕, 沈顺根, 吴有生. 推进器激励的艇体辐射噪声及控制技术研究现状[J]. 中国造船, 2010, 51(4): 234-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2010.04.030 Xie J R, Shen S G, Wu Y S. Research status of hull radiated noise induced by propeller and its control technology[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2010, 51(4): 234-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2010.04.030
[3]	苏常伟, 梁冉, 王雪仁, 等. 水下航行器线谱振动噪声研究进展[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2023, 45(9): 1-8. Su C W, Liang R, Wang X R, et al. Research progress on line spectrum vibration and noise of underwater vehicles[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2023, 45(9): 1-8.
[4]	姜荣俊, 何琳. 有源振动噪声控制技术在潜艇中的应用研究[J]. 噪声与振动控制, 2005, 25(2): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2005.02.001 Jiang R J, He L. Application research of active noise and vibration control technology in submarines[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2005, 25(2): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2005.02.001
[5]	胥强. 水下无人航行器振动建模及辐射噪声特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2021.
[6]	张维鹏. 基于流-固耦合的航行器艉部结构辐射噪声预报[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2024.
[7]	丁少虎, 王谦, 陈克安, 等. 有限长圆柱壳结构水下声辐射有源控制实验[J]. 噪声与振动控制, 2014, 34(2): 17-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1335.2014.02.005 Ding S H, Wang Q, Chen K A, et al. Experiment on active control of underwater sound radiation from finite cylindrical shell[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2014, 34(2): 17-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1335.2014.02.005
[8]	段勇, 郭君, 周凌波. 水下航行器尾段振动激励源特性试验研究[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2017, 25(4): 332-338. Duan Y, Guo J, Zhou L B. Experimental study on vibration excitation source characteristics of underwater vehicle tail section[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2017, 25(4): 332-338.
[9]	耿小明, 尹韶平, 周景军, 等. 圆柱壳体振动主动控制作动器位置优化方法[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2020, 28(6): 650-656. Geng X , Yin S P, Zhou J J, et al. Optimization method of actuator placement for active vibration control of cylindrical shell[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2020, 28(6): 650-656.
[10]	于兴博. 水下结构低频线谱噪声主动控制算法优化和系统实现[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2024.
[11]	穆青. 水下螺旋桨低频辐射噪声的有源控制方法理论研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2020.
[12]	李正凯. 泵喷推进器低频噪声有源控制方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2021.
[13]	李正凯, 于兴博, 商德江, 等. 泵喷推进器有源噪声控制的误差传感器布放优化方法研究[J]. 船舶力学, 2022, 26(8): 1354-1363. Li Z K, Yu X B, Shang D J, et al. Optimization of error sensor placement for active noise control of pump-jet propeller[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2022, 26(8): 1354-1363.
[14]	杨雨浓, 王晴, 王春旭, 等. 一种水下航行器推进器噪声主动控制方法: CN114664279B[P], 2024-12-13.