• 中国科技核心期刊
  • Scopus收录期刊
  • DOAJ收录期刊
  • JST收录期刊
  • Euro Pub收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于光学的水下小目标探测技术综述

陈青艳 吴国俊 吴亚风 苗宇宏

陈青艳, 吴国俊, 吴亚风, 等. 基于光学的水下小目标探测技术综述[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2026, 34(3): 1-12 doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0049
引用本文: 陈青艳, 吴国俊, 吴亚风, 等. 基于光学的水下小目标探测技术综述[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2026, 34(3): 1-12 doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0049
CHEN Qingyan, WU Guojun, WU Yafeng, MIAO Yuhong. Review of Optical-based Detection Technology for Underwater Small Targets[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0049
Citation: CHEN Qingyan, WU Guojun, WU Yafeng, MIAO Yuhong. Review of Optical-based Detection Technology for Underwater Small Targets[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0049

基于光学的水下小目标探测技术综述

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0049
基金项目: 中国科学院重国防科技创新专项重点部署项目资助(KGFZD-145-25-15); 崂山国家实验室自理科技创新项目资助(LSKJ202502201).
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈青艳(1995-), 女, 博士, 助理研究员, 主要研究方向为水下图像处理及三维点云识别

    通讯作者:

    吴亚风(1990-), 男, 硕士, 高级工程师, 主要研究方向为水下光学探测.

  • 中图分类号: TJ630; U754.4

Review of Optical-based Detection Technology for Underwater Small Targets

  • 摘要: 水下小目标(如微型水下航行器、水下探测器装置)的精准探测与识别是海洋资源开发、水下安防预警及水下工程检测等领域的重要内容。受水体衰减、光学散射、声波多径效应及复杂背景噪声等因素的综合制约, 传统探测技术在作用距离、空间分辨率与实时响应性等方面存在显著局限。随着海洋开发向精细化、智能化方向迈进, 以及水下无人装备对抗的战略价值持续凸显, 水下小目标光学探测技术已成为当前海洋信息技术领域的研究热点。文中系统梳理水下小目标光学探测技术的研究背景与战略意义, 重点从基于图像和基于激光雷达(LiDAR)两大技术路径展开全面综述: 在基于图像的技术体系中, 聚焦图像增强与目标检测两大核心环节, 深入剖析各类技术的原理机制、改进策略及性能表现; 在基于LiDAR的技术体系中, 针对面扫描成像、点扫描成像及线扫描成像等探测模式, 系统阐述其技术特性与典型应用场景。文中进一步剖析现有技术面临的瓶颈问题, 并结合海洋技术发展趋势展望未来研究方向, 为水下小目标光学探测技术的工程化落地提供理论支撑。

     

  • 图  1  WaterGAN生成深度图

    Figure  1.  Depth map generated by WaterGAN

    图  2  UWCNN算法效果

    Figure  2.  Performance of the UWCNN

    图  3  典型面扫描LiDAR系统

    Figure  3.  Typical area-scanning LiDAR system

    图  4  水下激光距离选通成像系统

    Figure  4.  Underwater laser range-gated imaging system

    图  5  典型点扫描LiDAR

    Figure  5.  Typical point-scanning LiDAR system

    图  6  典型线扫描LiDAR

    Figure  6.  Typical line-scanning LiDAR system

    图  7  水下线扫描LiDAR样机及海试结果

    Figure  7.  Prototype of an underwater line-scanning LiDAR and sea trial results

    图  8  自扫描测量设备及示意图

    Figure  8.  Self-scanning measurement device and schematic diagram

    表  1  不同方法在测试集的定量评估

    Table  1.   Quantitative Evaluation on the UIEB Dataset

    评价指标 RED UDCP ODM UIBLA UWCNN
    MSE 2107.3 5131 3208.6 3012.6 3887.7
    PSNR 14.935 11.029 16.085 15.079 18.79
    SSIM 0.5965 0.5019 0.5040 0.6957 0.7558
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  典型面扫描LiDAR系统

    Table  2.   Typical area-scanning LiDAR system

    科研单位分辨率视场角帧频
    加拿大国防研究所[55]8 cm@12 m10 mrad30 fps@488×380
    美国海军研究所10 cm@15 m100×5 mrad2 kfps@20×1
    瑞典国防研究所[56]4 mm@3 m37.5°0.2 fps@752×582
    德国圣路易斯
    研究所[57]
    cm级@6.5 m17°×13°21 fps@680×512
    英国赫瑞-瓦特0.18 mm@3 m1.89×0.4 mrad10 fps
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  典型点扫描LiDAR系统

    Table  3.   Typical point-scanning LiDAR system

    科研单位 分辨率 视场角 帧频
    英国赫瑞瓦特 1 mm 1.6° 0.05 fps@256×256
    日本三菱电机株式会社 20 mm 120°×30° 0.2 fps@1080×214
    加拿大Kraken Robotics 2 mm 65°×50° 0.1 fps
    美国3D at depth 0.5 mm 30° 0.019 fps@1450×1450
    广西测绘激光雷达智能
    装备中试基地(GQ-23)
    约20 cm 3 min/万m2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  典型线扫描LiDAR系统

    Table  4.   Typical line-scanning LiDAR system

    科研单位 分辨率 视场角 帧频
    西班牙赫罗纳 3 mm@3 m 35°×35° 70 fps
    加拿大Voyis公司 4.1 mm@10 m 50° 90 fps
    葡萄牙波尔图大学[60] 0.8 mm@1 m 45°×35° 10 fps
    西安光机所 40° 29 fps
    中国海洋大学 0.4 mm@0.4 m 40° 10 fps
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Chen L, Huang Y, Dong J, et al. Underwater optical object detection in the era of artificial intelligence: current, challenge, and future[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2025, 58(3): 1-34. doi: 10.1145/3759243
    [2] Zhao L, Ren X, Fu L, et al. UWS-YOLO: Advancing underwater sonar object detection via transfer learning and orthogonal-snake convolution mechanisms[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2025, 13(10): 1847. doi: 10.3390/jmse13101847
    [3] Sun Z, Tian T, Hu H, et al. Extreme-depth water-related optical imaging: Conquering ultra-low illumination environments from epipelagic zone to Mariana Trench[J]. Photoni X, 2026, 7(1): 7. doi: 10.1186/s43074-025-00212-4
    [4] 孙哲, 李学龙. 涉水载波调制激光成像与信号处理方法综述[J]. 光学学报, 2026, 46(12): 50.

    Sun Z, Li X L. Review on waterborne carrier modulation laser imaging and signal processing methods[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2026, 46(12): 50.
    [5] 赵昊飞, 孙哲, 安泓郡, 李广英, 李学龙, 可学习频域滤波的水下载波调制激光雷达成像[J].(特邀), 光学学报, 2025, 45(19): 1911006.

    Zhao H F, Sun Z, An H J, et al. Underwater carrier modulation LiDAR imaging with learnable frequency-domain filtering[J]. (invited), Acta Optica Sinica, 2025, 45(19): 1911006.
    [6] Zhe S, Li X L. Water-related optical imaging: From algorithm to hardware[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2025, 68(1): 1100401. doi: 10.1007/s11431-023-2614-8
    [7] Lim S H, Mat Isa N A, Ooi C H, et al. A new histogram equalization method for digital image enhancement and brightness preservation[J]. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2015, 9(3): 675-689. doi: 10.1007/s11760-013-0500-z
    [8] Pizer S M, Amburn E P, Austin J D, et al. Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations[J]. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1987, 39(3): 355-368. doi: 10.1016/S0734-189X(87)80186-X
    [9] Iqbal K, Odetayo M, James A, et al. Enhancing the low quality images using unsupervised colour correction method[C]//2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. IEEE, 2010: 1703-1709.
    [10] ZHOU J C, PANG L, ZHANG D H, et al. Underwater image enhancement method via multi-interval subhistogram perspective equalization[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2023, 48(2): 474-488. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2022.3223733
    [11] Fu X, Zhuang P, Huang Y, et al. A retinex-based enhancing approach for single underwater image[C]//2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2014: 4572-4576.
    [12] Petro A B, Sbert C, Morel J M. Multiscale retinex[J]. Image Processing on Line, 2014: 71-88.
    [13] He K, Sun J, Tang X. Single image haze removal using dark channel prior[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 33(12): 2341-2353. doi: 10.18535/ijecs/v5i1.12
    [14] Chiang J Y, Chen Y C. Underwater image enhancement by wavelength compensation and dehazing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2011, 21(4): 1756-1769. doi: 10.1109/tip.2011.2179666
    [15] Drews P L J, Nascimento E R, Botelho S S C, et al. Underwater depth estimation and image restoration based on single images[J]. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2016, 36(2): 24-35. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2016.26
    [16] Liu H, Chau L P. Underwater image restoration based on contrast enhancement[C]//2016 IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing. IEEE, 2016: 584-588.
    [17] Peng Y T, Cao K, Cosman P C. Generalization of the dark channel prior for single image restoration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018, 27(6): 2856-2868. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2018.2813092
    [18] Carlevaris-Bianco N, Mohan A, Eustice R M. Initial results in underwater single image dehazing[C]//Oceans 2010 Mts/IEEE Seattle. IEEE, 2010: 1-8.
    [19] Galdran A, Pardo D, Picón A, et al. Automatic red-channel underwater image restoration[J]. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2015, 26: 132-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2014.11.006
    [20] Li C Y, Guo J C, Cong R M, et al. Underwater image enhancement by dehazing with minimum information loss and histogram distribution prior[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2016, 25(12): 5664-5677. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2016.2612882
    [21] Peng Y T, Cosman P C. Underwater image restoration based on image blurriness and light absorption[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2017, 26(4): 1579-1594. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2663846
    [22] Akkaynak D, Treibitz T. Sea-thru: A method for removing water from underwater images[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019: 1682-1691.
    [23] Akkaynak D, Treibitz T. A revised underwater image formation model[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018: 6723-6732.
    [24] Anwar S, Li C. Diving deeper into underwater image enhancement: A survey[J]. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2020, 89: 115978. doi: 10.1016/j.image.2020.115978
    [25] Li J, Skinner K A, Eustice R M, et al. WaterGAN: Unsupervised generative network to enable real-time color correction of monocular underwater images[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation letters, 2017, 3(1): 387-394. doi: 10.1109/lra.2017.2730363
    [26] Li C, Anwar S, Porikli F. Underwater scene prior inspired deep underwater image and video enhancement[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2020, 98: 107038. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107038
    [27] Zhu J Y, Park T, Isola P, et al. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2017: 2223-2232.
    [28] Li C, Guo J, Guo C. Emerging from water: Underwater image color correction based on weakly supervised color transfer[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2018, 25(3): 323-327. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2018.2792050
    [29] Oktay O, Schlemper J, Folgoc L L, et al. Attention u-net: Learning where to look for the pancreas[J]. arxiv preprint arxiv: 1804.03999, 2018.
    [30] Zhou Z, Rahman Siddiquee M M, Tajbakhsh N, et al. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation[C]//International workshop on deep learning in medical image analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 3-11.
    [31] Li C, Guo C, Ren W, et al. An underwater image enhancement benchmark dataset and beyond[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2019, 29: 4376-4389. doi: 10.1109/tip.2019.2955241
    [32] Lin T Y, Dollár P, Girshick R, et al. Feature pyramid networks for object detection[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2017: 2117-2125.
    [33] Quang T N, Lee S, Song B C. Object detection using improved bi-directional feature pyramid network[J]. Electronics, 2021, 10(6): 746. doi: 10.3390/electronics10060746
    [34] Ren S, He K, Girshick R, et al. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2016, 39(6): 1137-1149. doi: 10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031
    [35] Hussain M. YOLO-v1 to YOLO-v8, the rise of YOLO and its complementary nature toward digital manufacturing and industrial defect detection[J]. Machines, 2023, 11(7): 677. doi: 10.3390/machines11070677
    [36] Han L, Li N, Li J, et al. SA-FPN: Scale-aware attention-guided feature pyramid network for small object detection on surface defect detection of steel strips[J]. Measurement, 2025, 249: 117019. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117019
    [37] Zhao S, Zheng J, Sun S, et al. An improved YOLO algorithm for fast and accurate underwater object detection[J]. Symmetry, 2022, 14(8): 1669. doi: 10.3390/sym14081669
    [38] Pan T S, Huang H C, Lee J C, et al. Multi-scale ResNet for real-time underwater object detection[J]. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2021, 15(5): 941-949. doi: 10.1007/s11760-020-01818-w
    [39] Li X, Yu H, Chen H. Multi-scale aggregation feature pyramid with cornerness for underwater object detection[J]. The Visual Computer, 2024, 40(2): 1299-1310. doi: 10.1007/s00371-023-02849-3
    [40] Chen Y, An H, Sun Z, et al. Large model enhanced computational ghost imaging[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2025, 68(11): 2120403. doi: 10.1007/s11431-025-3062-3
    [41] Yang C, Zhang C, Jiang L, et al. Underwater image object detection based on multi-scale feature fusion[J]. Machine Vision and Applications, 2024, 35(6): 124. doi: 10.1007/s00138-024-01606-3
    [42] Cao J, Bao W, Shang H, et al. GCL-YOLO: A GhostConv-based lightweight yolo network for UAV small object detection[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(20): 4932. doi: 10.3390/rs15204932
    [43] Wei C, Wang W. RFAG-YOLO: A Receptive Field Attention-Guided YOLO Network for Small-Object Detection in UAV Images[J]. Sensors, 2025, 25(7): 2193. doi: 10.3390/s25072193
    [44] Wang G, Chen Y, An P, et al. UAV-YOLOv8: A small-object-detection model based on improved YOLOv8 for UAV aerial photography scenarios[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(16): 7190. doi: 10.3390/s23167190
    [45] He L, Zhou Y, Liu L, et al. Research on object detection and recognition in remote sensing images based on YOLOv11[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 14032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96314-x
    [46] Wang J, Zhao H. Improved yolov8 algorithm for water surface object detection[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(15): 5059. doi: 10.3390/s24155059
    [47] Cai S, Zhou X, Cai W, et al. Lightweight underwater object detection method based on multi-scale edge information selection[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 27681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13566-3
    [48] Liu F, Fei Y, Su M, et al. A novel lightweight model for underwater small object detection[C]//2024 China Automation Congress (CAC). IEEE, 2024: 2226-2231.
    [49] Xu F, Ding X, Peng J, et al. Real-time detecting method of marine small object with underwater robot vision[C]//2018 OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO). IEEE, 2018: 1-4.
    [50] Ge W, Sun J, Xu Y, et al. Real-time object detection algorithm for underwater robots[C]//2021 China Automation Congress (CAC). IEEE, 2021: 7703-7707.
    [51] Li M, Pang H, Jiang C. SGL-YOLO: Lightweight underwater object detection algorithm based on feature fusion: M. Li et al[J]. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2025, 19(16): 1372. doi: 10.1007/s11760-025-04962-3
    [52] Yu C, Yu Y, Wang Z, et al. The current state of development in underwater lidar detection[C]//Sixth Conference on Frontiers in Optical Imaging and Technology: Novel Technologies in Optical Systems, 2024: 299-319.
    [53] Wang M, Zhang K, Wei H, et al. Underwater image quality optimization: Researches, challenges, and future trends[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2024, 146: 104995. doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2024.104995
    [54] Acharekar M A. Underwater laser imaging system (ULIS)[C]//Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets II. SPIE, 1997, 3079: 750-761.
    [55] Forand J L, Fournier G R, Bonnier D, et al. LUCIE: A laser underwater camera image enhancer[C]//Proceedings of OCEANS ’93. 1993, 3: 187-/190
    [56] Andersson A. Range gated viewing with underwater camera[M]. Institutionen för systemteknik, 2005.
    [57] Dalgleish F, Ouyang B, Vuorenkoski A. A unified framework for image performance enhancement of extended range laser seabed survey sensors[C]//2013 IEEE International Underwater Technology Symposium (UT). 2013: 1-7.
    [58] Imaki M, Ochimizu H, Tsuji H, et al. Underwater three-dimensional imaging laser sensor with 120-deg wide-scanning angle using the combination of a dome lens and coaxial optics[J]. Optical Engineering, 2016, 56(3): 031212. doi: 10.1117/1.oe.56.3.031212
    [59] Castillón M, Forest J, Ridao P. Underwater 3D scanner to counteract refraction: calibration and experimental results[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2022, 27(6): 4974-4982. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2022.3170504
    [60] Leite P N, Pereira P N, Dionísio J M M, et al. Hybrid underwater imaging for the tri-dimensional inspection of critical structural elements in offshore platforms[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 314: 119658. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119658
    [61] Li X, An H, Zhao H, et al. Streaknet-arch: an anti-scattering network-based architecture for underwater carrier lidar-radar imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2025, 34: 4357-4370. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2025.3586431
    [62] Li S, Gao X, Wang H, et al. Monocular underwater measurement of structured light by scanning with vibrating mirrors[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2023, 169: 107738. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107738
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  18
  • HTML全文浏览量:  9
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-03-06
  • 修回日期:  2026-04-15
  • 录用日期:  2026-04-20
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-05-26
图(8) / 表(4)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    服务号
    订阅号