基于ADC模型的水下异构平台效能评估

张鑫; 潘进; 张静; 陈博恒

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0143

基于ADC模型的水下异构平台效能评估

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0143

中国船舶集团有限公司第七〇五研究所, 陕西西安, 710077

详细信息

作者简介:
张鑫：张　鑫, 男, 1995-, 硕士, 工程师, 主要研究方向为系统工程

计量
- 文章访问数: 39
- HTML全文浏览量: 14
- PDF下载量: 17
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-11-07
- 修回日期: 2024-02-22
- 录用日期: 2024-03-07
- 网络出版日期: 2024-07-15

Effectiveness Evaluation of Underwater Heterogeneous Platforms Based on ADC Model

The 705 Research Institute, China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited, Xi’an 710077, China

摘要

摘要: 装备集群作业逐步成为提高水下任务效能的关键途径, 传统ADC模型对多型装备构成的水下异构平台任务进行协同能力评估具有一定困难。选取以时间为变量的可靠性指标、续航能力指标和通信性能指标, 建立树结构的指标综合模型, 能够对协同因素进行数值量化, 客观反映平台任务过程中的协同能力变化。以此为依据将能力矩阵进行连续化处理, 并以装备个体为分系统, 引入环境影响因子反映周边环境对装备性能的影响, 建立改进型ADC模型用于系统效能评估。以自主水下航行器和通信节点构成的水下异构平台为例, 对任务周期内的装备能力及平台效能进行评估, 研究结果表明: 该方法能够很好的结合多个协同因素进行效能评估, 具有可行性和有效性, 可以为多类型装备协同作业任务效能评估提供参考。
- 水下异构平台 /
- 效能 /
- ADC模型 /
- 动态能力矩阵 /
- 指标综合模型
Abstract: Equipment clusters are gradually emerging as a key way to improve the efficiency of underwater tasks. Traditional ADC models make it difficult to evaluate collaborative ability of an underwater heterogeneous platform composed of multi-type equipment. The reliability, endurance, and communication performance indicators with time variables are selected, and a comprehensive model of the tree structure is established, which can quantify the synergy factors numerically and objectively reflect the changes in synergistic ability during the platform task process. Based on this as the basis for constructing dynamic capacity matrix and using the individual as the sub-system, the environmental impact factor is introduced to reflect the impact of the surrounding environment on the equipment performance, and an improved ADC model is established for system effectiveness evaluation. Taking the underwater heterogeneous platform composed of AUVS and communication nodes as an example, the equipment capability and platform effectiveness in the mission cycle are evaluated. The research results indicated that this method can be well combined with multiple synergistic factors for effectiveness evaluation, which is feasible and effective. The improved ADC model can provide a reference for the efficiency evaluation of multi-type equipment collaborative operation tasks.
- underwater heterogeneous platforms /
- effectiveness /
- ADC model /
- dynamic capability matrix /
- comprehensive index model

HTML全文

图 1 层次分析法影响因素

Figure 1. Influencing factors of analytic hierarchy process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 能力评价指标

Figure 2. Capability evaluation index

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 剩余续航时间量化关系图

Figure 3. Quantitative relationship of battery life

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 能力综合模型

Figure 4. Capability synthesis model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 任务部署

Figure 5. Task deployment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 可靠性能力变化

Figure 6. Change in reliability capability

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 续航能力

Figure 7. Endurance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 基于装备能力的效能曲线

Figure 8. Effectiveness based on equipment capability

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 基于装备能力的不同平台效能曲线

Figure 9. Effectiveness of different platforms based on equipment capability

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 链路通信能力变化曲线

Figure 10. Change of link communication capability

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 效能变化曲线

Figure 11. Efficiency curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 t时刻各装备能力

Table 1. Equipment capacities at t times

时刻t	装备1	装备2	···	装备n
可靠性	R₁(t)	R₂(t)	···	R_n(t)
续航能力	T₁(t)	T₂(t)	···	T_n(t)

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 水下异构平台状态

Table 2. Status of underwater heterogeneous platforms

水下异构平台可能存在的状态
状态	AUV1	AUV2	AUV3	Point1 & Point2	备注
C_a1	1	1	1	1	1代表正常, 0代表故障
C_a2	1	1	0	1
C_a3	1	0	1	1
C_a4	1	0	0	1
C_a5	0	1	1	1
C_a6	0	1	0	1
C_a7	0	0	1	1
C_a8	0	0	0	1

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 水下异构平台可靠性参数

Table 3. Reliability parameters of underwater heterogeneous platform

水下异构平台	故障率	正常工作概率
AUV1	0.0052	0.9506
AUV2	0.0062	0.9702
AUV3	0.0062	0.9702

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	曹勇, 曹永辉, 黄桥高, 等. 水下仿生扑翼机器人的发展现状综述[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防, 2023, 6(4): 380-405. CAO Y, CAO Y H, HUANG Q G, et al. A review of the underwater bionic flapping wing robots[J]. Digital Ocean and Underwater Warfare, 2023, 6(4): 380-405.
[2]	HUANG H, TANG Q, LI J, et al. A review on underwater autonomous environmental perception and target grasp, the challenge of robotic organism capture[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 195: 106644. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106644
[3]	张延厚, 王超, 张奇, 等. 水声目标探测和识别融合技术发展综述[J]. 信号处理, 2023, 39(10): 1711-1727. ZHANG Y H, WANG C, ZHANG Q, et al. A review of underwater acoustic target detection and recognition technology based on information fusion[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2023, 39(10): 1711-1727.
[4]	苏泓嘉, 罗宇成, 刘飞. 装备体系效能评估及支撑技术综述[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6(3): 29-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4641.2023.03.005 SU H J, LUO Y C, LIU F. Review of equipment effectiveness evaluation and supporting technologies[J]. Air & Space Defense, 2023, 6(3): 29-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4641.2023.03.005
[5]	程恺, 张宏军, 柳亚婷, 等. 作战效能及其评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统科学学报, 2014, 22(1): 91-95. CHENG K, ZHANG H J, LIU Y T, et al. Research on combat effectiveness and evaluation methods[J]. Journal of System Science, 2014, 22(1): 91-95.
[6]	Shao R, Fang Z, Tao L, et al. A comprehensive G-Lz-ADC effectiveness evaluation model for the single communication satellite system in the context of poor information[J]. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 2022, 12(2): 417-461. doi: 10.1108/GS-03-2021-0030
[7]	孟庆德, 张俊, 魏军辉, 等. 基于ADC法的舰炮武器系统作战效能评估模型[J]. 火炮发射与控制学报, 2015, 36(1): 73-76 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6524.2015.01.016 MENG Q D, ZHANG J, WEI J H, et al. Operational effectiveness evaluation model of naval gun weapon system based on ADC[J]. Journal of Gun Launch & Control, 2015, 36(1): 73-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6524.2015.01.016
[8]	Zhao Y Q, AN S, MAI Q, et al. Effectiveness modeling of air defense missile weapon system based on ADC method[J]. Systems Engineering & Electronics, 2020, 42(9): 2003.
[9]	徐榕, 吴茂林, 胡平. 改进ADC方法在潜艇作战系统效能评估中的应用[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(8): 141-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.08.023 XU R, WU M L, HU P. Application of improved ADC method for submarine combat system effectiveness assessment[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(8): 141-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.08.023
[10]	常会振, 秦大国, 孙盛智, 等. 基于ADC模型优化的海上无人机作战效能评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2023, 44(9): 58-68. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2023.09.008 CHANG H Z, Qin G K, SUN S Z, et al. Operational effectiveness evaluation of marine unmanned aerial vehicle based on ADC model optimization[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2023, 44(9): 58-68. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2023.09.008
[11]	姚群, 舒健生, 王小亮. 信息化条件下反舰作战效能评估指标体系研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2017, 38(5): 48-51. doi: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.05.011 YAO Q, Shu J S, WANG X L. Effectiveness evaluation index system of anti-ship combat under the informationization condition[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2017, 38(5): 48-51. doi: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.05.011
[12]	孟庆玉, 张静远, 宋保维. 鱼雷作战效能分析[M]. 国防工业出版社, 2003.
[13]	欧俊麟. 一种多AUV协同系统搜潜效能研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2019.
[14]	莫军, 李博. 海洋环境对潜艇作战的影响效能[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2011, 32(9): 1-3. MO J, Li B. Effect of ocean environment impact for submarine operation[J]. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2011, 32(9): 1-3.
[15]	莫军, 田亚龙. 海洋环境对水下航行安全影响的综合评估[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2012, 34(10): 89-93. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2012.10.019 MO J, TIAN Y L. The comprehensive assessment about the marine environment on submarine navigation safety influence[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2012, 34(10): 89-93. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2012.10.019
[16]	Tholen C, Nolle L, Wewner J. On the influence of localisation and communication error on the behaviour of a swarm of autonomous underwater vehicles[C]//23rd International Conference on Soft Computing. [S.l.]: Springer, 2017: 68-79.
[17]	杨策, 董理, 张志华, 等. 鱼雷生产定型实航工作可靠度的Bayes评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41(3): 123-126, 131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.03.030 YANG C, Dong L, Zhang Z H, et al. A Bayesian evaluation method for trial reliability of torpedo production approval[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2016, 41(3): 123-126, 131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.03.030
[18]	宋保维. 鱼雷系统工程原理与方法[M]. 哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 2010.
[19]	MENG J, RICCO M, LUO G, et al. An overview and comparison of online implementable SOC estimation methods for lithium-ion battery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2017, 54(2): 1583-1591.
[20]	高进兴, 陈俊铭, 左添仲. 电池装置的剩余容量与剩余使用时间的估算方法: CN201110048672.6 [P]. 2011-09-28.
[21]	LIANG Q, Ou J, Yan X, et al. Effect of nodes movement on all-terminal reliability of multi-AUV cooperative system[C]//OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston. Charleston, USA: IEEE, 2018: 1-6.
[22]	孙天元. 多AUV协同系统拓扑结构可靠性研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2014.