• 中国科技核心期刊
  • Scopus收录期刊
  • DOAJ收录期刊
  • JST收录期刊
  • Euro Pub收录期刊
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Zhewei, XU Xiaojun, FENG Yikun, ZHANG Guoqing, JIN Haobin, GE Qiqian, WANG Jiancheng, ZHANG Xin. Effects of Front-Side Angles of Floating Boxes on the Navigation Performance of an Amphibious Vehicle in Calm Water[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0092
Citation: ZHANG Zhewei, XU Xiaojun, FENG Yikun, ZHANG Guoqing, JIN Haobin, GE Qiqian, WANG Jiancheng, ZHANG Xin. Effects of Front-Side Angles of Floating Boxes on the Navigation Performance of an Amphibious Vehicle in Calm Water[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0092

Effects of Front-Side Angles of Floating Boxes on the Navigation Performance of an Amphibious Vehicle in Calm Water

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2026-0092
  • Received Date: 2026-05-13
  • Accepted Date: 2026-06-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-06-11
  • Available Online: 2026-09-11
  • To clarify the effects of the front-side angles of floating boxes on the resistance, attitude response, and local flow field of an amphibious vehicle in calm water, a specific amphibious vehicle was investigated based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes(RANS) equations. Within the framework of computational fluid dynamics(CFD), the shear stress transport(SST) k-ω turbulence model and the volume of fluid (VOF) free-surface model were employed to analyze the hydrodynamic effects of the front-side geometric angles of the floating boxes. By varying the front inclined angle α1 and the outer guide-surface angle α2, the resistance, pitch, heave, free-surface patterns, and pressure distributions were comparatively analyzed at a fixed displacement condition and a speed of 6m·s1. Towing-tank experiments were also conducted to validate the numerical method. The results show that, within the parameter ranges investigated, as α1 increases from 15° to 35°, the normalized resistance R/∇ increases from 2.509 to 2.690, corresponding to an increase of approximately 7.2%. At larger α1, the high-pressure region near the leading part of the floating box expands, accompanied by intensified free-surface disturbance and wave-making effects. The pitch angle first decreases slightly and then gradually increases, whereas the heave displacement first decreases and subsequently exhibits small fluctuations. Among the discrete cases investigated, the minimum heave displacement of 0.009 529 m occurs at α1=25°, where R/∇ is 2.542, approximately 1.3% higher than that at α1=15°, and the pitch angle is 4.255°. Therefore, the favorable values of α1 differ among individual hydrodynamic performance indices, and an overall optimum cannot be identified without an explicitly defined multi-objective evaluation criterion. In comparison, variations in α2 produce a smaller resistance response. At α2=30°, R/∇ reaches the maximum value of 2.650 among the investigated cases, accompanied by relatively strong transverse-wave interference. The results indicate that the front-side angles of the floating boxes affect navigation resistance through changes in local pressure distribution, vehicle attitude response, and free-surface wave patterns, providing a reference for the selection and further optimization of the front-side geometric parameters of the floating boxes for the vehicle investigated in this study.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Sun C L, Xu X J, Zou T A, et al. Investigation on trim control of semi-planing amphibious cargo truck using experimental and numerical approaches[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2022, 236(3): 1322-1333. doi: 10.1177/09544062211021445
    [2]
    Fan J W, Chang Y, Zhu H, et al. Simulation study on the navigation resistance and shape optimization of a new type of amphibious vehicle[J]. Symmetry, 2025, 17(2): 193. doi: 10.3390/sym17020193
    [3]
    El M O, Zimmermann M. Numerical investigation of the influence of bow shape on ship resistance and wave pattern[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2012, 38(14-15): 1747-1760.
    [4]
    Seo J, Kim Y, Park J. Numerical and experimental study on the hydrodynamic performance of an amphibious tracked vehicle[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(6): 432. doi: 10.3390/jmse8060432
    [5]
    Zhang G Q, Feng Y K, Xu X J. Numerical investigation of underwater wing-tail's angle effect on an amphibious vehicle’s water resistance reduction[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 301: 118505.
    [6]
    Sun C L, Xu X J, Tang Y J, et al. Experimental and numerical simulation of reducing resistance and increasing speed for a segmented-track amphibious vehicle[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2022, 44(5): 201-208.
    [7]
    Feng Y K, Zhang G Q, Wang J C, et al. Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamic characteristics of a light high-speed amphibious vehicle in still water under oblique inflow conditions[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37(4): 047150. doi: 10.1063/5.0271256
    [8]
    Liu B L, Pan D B, Xu X J. Study and optimization of a deformable trimaran amphibious transport vehicle's resistance characteristic[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(4): 045159. doi: 10.1063/5.0205312
    [9]
    Guo S M, Yang X H, Li H Y, et al. Numerical study on the influence of catamaran hull arrangement and demihull angle on calm-water resistance[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2025, 13(4): 815. doi: 10.3390/jmse13040815
    [10]
    Insel M. An investigation into the resistance components of high-speed displacement catamarans[D]. Southampton: University of Southampton, 1990.
    [11]
    Pan D B, Xu X J, et al. Effect of floating boxes on hydrodynamic performance of amphibious transport vehicle: influence of floating-box lengths and longitudinal positions[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37(8): 085206. doi: 10.1063/5.0281620
    [12]
    Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605. doi: 10.2514/3.12149
    [13]
    Hirt C W, Nichols B D. Volume of fluid(VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 39(1): 201-225. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
    [14]
    Celik I B, Ghia U, Roache P J, et al. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(7): 078001. doi: 10.1115/1.2960953
    [15]
    Roache P J. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering[M]. Albuquerque: Hermosa Publishers, 1998.
    [16]
    Zhang G Q, Feng Y K, Jin H B, et al. Numerical analysis of effect of stern flap on hydrodynamic performance of amphibious vehicles[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2026, 34(1): 1-8.
    [17]
    Zhang G Q, Feng Y K, Wang J C, et al. Experimental study on sailing resistance and attitude of amphibious unmanned vehicles under still-water towing conditions[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2026, 34(2): 338-344.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(17)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(17) PDF Downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    Service
    Subscribe

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return