System Effectiveness Evaluation of Acoustic Glider Based on Optimized ADC Model

TANG Shuai; FAN Peiqin; ZHANG Chi; ZOU Jiayun

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2024-0175

Volume 33 Issue 4

Aug 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems > 2025 > 33(4): 581-588

TANG Shuai, FAN Peiqin, ZHANG Chi, ZOU Jiayun. System Effectiveness Evaluation of Acoustic Glider Based on Optimized ADC Model[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2025, 33(4): 581-588. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2024-0175

Citation:

TANG Shuai, FAN Peiqin, ZHANG Chi, ZOU Jiayun. System Effectiveness Evaluation of Acoustic Glider Based on Optimized ADC Model[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2025, 33(4): 581-588. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2024-0175

Citation:

PDF( 717 KB)

System Effectiveness Evaluation of Acoustic Glider Based on Optimized ADC Model

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2024-0175

Navy Submarine Academy, Qingdao 266199, China

Received Date: 2024-12-20
Accepted Date: 2025-02-08
Rev Recd Date: 2025-02-05

Available Online: 2025-06-25

Abstract

Abstract

With the development of unmanned underwater technology, acoustic gliders are increasingly becoming advantageous platforms for marine environment observation and underwater target detection. Evaluating their system effectiveness has thus become a key focus. Based on the characteristics and influencing factors of the mission process, an effectiveness evaluation index system for acoustic glider systems was constructed. The traditional availability-dependability-capability(ADC) model was optimized by considering the effects of the marine environment and comprehensive support on acoustic gliders. The analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was used to determine the weights of the three-level indices. The feasibility of the model was verified by numerical examples, showing that the optimized ADC model produced more realistic evaluation results and provided a methodological reference for the effectiveness evaluation of unmanned maritime equipment.
- acoustic glider,
- ADC model,
- effectiveness evaluation,
- index system

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	孙大军, 吕云飞, 师俊杰, 等. 声学滑翔机技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防, 2023, 6(2): 133-144. SUN D J, LÜ Y F, SHI J J, et al. Discussion on present situation and future trend of acoustic glider technology[J]. Digital Ocean & Underwater Warfare, 2023, 6(2): 133-144.
[2]	孙芹东, 兰世泉, 王超, 等. 水下声学滑翔机研究进展及关键技术[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2020, 28(1): 10-17. SUN Q D, LAN S Q, WANG C, et al. Key technologies of underwater acoustic glider: A review[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2020, 28(1): 10-17.
[3]	杨绍琼, 李元昊, 孙通帅, 等. “海燕”号谱系化水下滑翔机技术发展与应用[J]. 水下无人系统学报. 2023, 31(1): 68-85. YANG S Q, LI Y H, SUN T S, et al. Development and application of petrel serialized underwater glider technologies[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2023, 31(1): 68-85.
[4]	WANG H S, FENG W, XU W, et al. Measuring channel state information by underwater acoustic gliders[C]//2021 IEEE/ICIC International Conference on Communications in China(ICCC Workshops). Xiamen, China: IEEE, 2021.
[5]	NISHANT KUMAR B. US Navy seeks next generation LBS-G system[J]. IHS Jane's International Defence Review, 2021, 1(2): 2.
[6]	FURLONG M, MARLOW R, MUNAFO A, et al. OCEANIDS: Building next generation maritime autonomous systems[C]//International Ship Control Systems Symposium (ISCSS). Glasgow, UK: ISCSS, 2018: 23-24.
[7]	WYNN R, MILLER P I, GOULT S, et al. Marine autonomous systems in support of marine observations: Final report on the MASSMO4 mission[R]. Norwich: University of East Anglia, 2018.
[8]	SUN J, WANG J, SHI Y, et al. Self-noise spectrum analysis and joint noise filtering for the sea-wing underwater glider based on experimental data[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 42960-42970. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977176
[9]	LIPPSETT L .Ocean Observatories Initiative[J]. Oceanus, 2017, 53(1): 32-33.
[10]	王超, 孙芹东, 王文龙, 等. 水下目标警戒滑翔机声学系统设计与实现[J]. 声学技术, 2018, 37(5): 84-87 WANG C, SUN Q D, WANG W L, et al. Acoustic sytem design and implementation for underwater target warning glider[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2018, 37(5): 84-87.
[11]	王超, 孙芹东, 兰世全, 等. 水下声学滑翔机目标探测性能南海试验分析[J]. 声学技术, 2018, 37(6): 149-150 WANG C, SUN Q D, LAN S Q, et al. Underwater acoutic glider target detection performance trial analysis in the South China Sea[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2018, 37(6): 149-150
[12]	何胜杰, 郭强, 王兴虎, 等. 基于ADC分析法优化的无人机效能评估方法[J]. 无人系统技术, 2022, 5(2): 105-116. HE S J, GUO Q, WANG X H, et al. UAV performance evaluation optimized based on ADC analysis method[J]. Unmanned System Technology, 2022, 5(2): 105-116.
[13]	常会振, 秦大国, 孙盛智, 等. 基于ADC模型优化的海上无人机作战效能评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2023, 44(9): 58-68. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2023.09.008 CHANG H Z, QIN D G, SUN S Z, et al. Operational effectiveness evaluation of marine unmanned aerial vehicle based on ADC model optimization[J]. Journal of Ordance Equipment Engineering, 2023, 44(9): 58-68. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2023.09.008
[14]	齐智敏, 张海林, 伊山, 等. 智能无人机群体作战效能评估指标体系研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2021, 41(9): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2021.09.001 QI Z M, ZHANG H L, YI S, et al. Research on the index system of intelligent UAV group combat effectiveness evaluation[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2021, 41(9): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2021.09.001
[15]	杨秀竹. 水下滑翔机系统的效能评估研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2022.
[16]	MURRAY N L. Weapon system effectiveness industry advisory committee. Task group I. Requirements methodology[R]. Virginia, USA: DTIC, 1965.
[17]	刘登攀, 寇昆湖, 王超, 等. 基于改进ADC法的侦察无人机作战效能评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2024, 31(4): 121-127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2024.04.019 LIU D P, KOU K H, WANG C, et al. Operational effectiveness assessment of reconnaissance UAS based on improved ADC method[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2024, 31(4): 121-127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2024.04.019