System effectiveness evaluation of acoustic glider based on ADC model optimization

TANG Shuai; FAN Peiqin; ZHANG Chi; ZOU Jiayun

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2024-0175

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems > 2025 > Accepted Manuscript

TANG Shuai, FAN Peiqin, ZHANG Chi, ZOU Jiayun. System effectiveness evaluation of acoustic glider based on ADC model optimization[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2024-0175

Citation:

TANG Shuai, FAN Peiqin, ZHANG Chi, ZOU Jiayun. System effectiveness evaluation of acoustic glider based on ADC model optimization[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2024-0175

Citation:

PDF( 711 KB)

System effectiveness evaluation of acoustic glider based on ADC model optimization

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2024-0175

Navy Submarine Academy, Qingdao 266199, China

Received Date: 2024-12-20
Accepted Date: 2025-02-08
Rev Recd Date: 2025-02-05

Available Online: 2025-06-25

Abstract

Abstract

With the development of unmanned technology, acoustic glider is increasingly becoming an advantageous platform for the marine environment observation and underwater target detection. Evaluating the effectiveness has become one of the important topics. Based on the characters and key factors of mission and process, an acoustic glider system effectiveness assessment index system is constructed. This paper improves and optimizes ADC model by considering the effects of marine environment and comprehensive support on acoustic glider. The analytic hierarchy process(AHP)is used to determine the weights of three-level index. Finally, the feasibility of the model are verified by arithmetic examples, which show that the optimized ADC method makes the evaluation results more realistic and provide methodological reference for subsequent of the effectiveness of unmanned equipment.
- acoustic glider,
- ADC model,
- optimization and improvement,
- effectiveness evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	孙大军, 吕云飞, 师俊杰, 等. 声学滑翔机技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防, 2023, 6(2): 133-144. SUN D J, Lü Y F, SHI J J, et al. Discussion on present situation and future trend of acoustic glider technology[J]. Digital Ocean & Underwater Warfare, 2023, 6(2): 133-144.
[2]	孙芹东, 兰世泉, 王超, 等. 水下声学滑翔机研究进展及关键技术[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2020, 28(1): 10-17 SUN Q D, LAN S Q, WANG C, et al. Key technologies of underwater acoustic glider: a review[J]. Journal Of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2020, 28(1): 10-17.
[3]	杨绍琼, 李元昊, 孙通帅, 等. “海燕”号谱系化水下滑翔机技术发展与应用[J]. 水下无人系统学报. 2023, 31(1): 68-85. YANG S Q, LI Y H, SUN T S, et al. Development and application of petrel serialized underwater glider technologies[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2023, 31(1): 68-85.
[4]	WANG H S, FENG W, XU W, et al. Measuring channel state information by underwater acoustic gliders[C]//2021 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China(ICCC Workshops). Xiamen, China: IEEE, 2021.
[5]	NISHANT KUMAR B. US Navy seeks next generation LBS-G system[J]. IHS Jane's International Defence Review, 2021, 1(2): 2.
[6]	FURLONG M, MARLOW R, MUNAFO A, et al. OCEANIDS: Building next generation maritime autonomous systems[C]//International Ship Control Systems Symposium (ISCSS). Glasgow, UK: ISCSS, 2018: 23-24.
[7]	WYNN R, MILLER P I, GOULT S, et al. Marine autonomous systems in support of marine observations: Final report on the MASSMO4 mission (19 May to 06 June 2017)[R]. England: University of East Anglia, 2018.
[8]	SUN J, WANG J, SHI Y, et al. Self-noise spectrum analysis and joint noise filtering for the sea-wing underwater glider based on experimental data[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 42960-42970. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977176
[9]	OCEAN OBSERVATORIES INITIATIVE. 18th turn of the pioneer array in April[EB/OL]. (2015-03-01)[2025-06-11]. https://oceanobservatories.org/2022/04/18th-turn-of-the-pion eer-array-in-april/.
[10]	王超, 孙芹东, 王文龙, 等. 水下目标警戒滑翔机声学系统设计与实现[J]. 声学技术, 2018, 37(5): 84-87 WANG C, SUN Q D, WANG W L, et al. Acoustic sytem design and implementation for underwater target warning glider[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2018, 37(5): 84-87.
[11]	王超, 孙芹东, 兰世全, 等. 水下声学滑翔机目标探测性能南海试验分析[J]. 声学技术, 2018, 37(6): 149-150 WANG C, SUN Q D, LAN S R et al. Underwater acoutic glider target detection performance trial analysis in the South China Sea[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2018, 37(6): 149-150
[12]	何胜杰, 郭强, 王兴虎, 等. 基于ADC分析法优化的无人机效能评估方法[J]. 无人系统技术, 2022, 5(2): 105-116. HE S J, GUO Q, WANG X H, et al. UAV performance evaluation optimized based on ADC analysis method[J]. Unmanned System Technology, 2022, 5(2): 105-116.
[13]	常会振, 秦大国, 孙盛智, 等. 基于ADC模型优化的海上无人机作战效能评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2023, 44(9): 58-68. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2023.09.008 CHANG H Z, QIN D G, SUN S Z, et al. Operational effectiveness evaluation of marine unmanned aerial vehicle based on ADC model optimization[J]. Journal of Ordance Equipment Engineering, 2023, 44(9): 58-68. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2023.09.008
[14]	齐智敏, 张海林, 伊山, 等. 智能无人机群体作战效能评估指标体系研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2021, 41(9): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2021.09.001 QI Z M, ZHANG H L, YI S, et al. Research on the index system of intelligent uav group combat effectiveness evaluation[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2021, 41(9): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2021.09.001
[15]	杨秀竹. 水下滑翔机系统的效能评估研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2022. YANG X Z. Study on effectiveness evaluation of underwater glider system[D]. Tian Jing University, 2022.
[16]	MURRAY N L. Weapon system effectiveness industry advisory committee (Wseiac). task group i. requirements methodology [R]. USA: DTIC, 1965.
[17]	刘登攀, 寇昆湖, 王超, 等. 基于改进ADC法的侦察无人机作战效能评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2024, 31(4): 121-127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2024.04.019 LIU D P, KOU K H, WANG C, et al. Operational effectiveness assessment of reconnaissance UAS based on improved ADC method[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2024, 31(4): 121-127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2024.04.019