Effectiveness Evaluation of Underwater Heterogeneous Platforms Based on ADC Model

ZHANG Xin; PAN Jin; ZHANG Jing; CHEN Boheng; REN Ming; GUO Dong

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0143

Volume 32 Issue 5

Oct 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems > 2024 > 32(5): 931-939

ZHANG Xin, PAN Jin, ZHANG Jing, CHEN Boheng, REN Ming, GUO Dong. Effectiveness Evaluation of Underwater Heterogeneous Platforms Based on ADC Model[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2024, 32(5): 931-939. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0143

Citation:

ZHANG Xin, PAN Jin, ZHANG Jing, CHEN Boheng, REN Ming, GUO Dong. Effectiveness Evaluation of Underwater Heterogeneous Platforms Based on ADC Model[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2024, 32(5): 931-939. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0143

Citation:

PDF( 1295 KB)

Effectiveness Evaluation of Underwater Heterogeneous Platforms Based on ADC Model

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0143

1.
The 705 Research Institute, China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited, Xi’an 710077, China
2.
Unit 91291^th, The Liberation Army of China, Sanya 572011, China

Received Date: 2023-11-07
Accepted Date: 2024-03-07
Rev Recd Date: 2024-02-22

Available Online: 2024-07-15

Abstract

Abstract

Equipment clusters are gradually emerging as a key way to improve the efficiency of underwater tasks. Traditional availability dependability capacity(ADC) models make it difficult to evaluate the collaborative ability of an underwater heterogeneous platform composed of multi-type equipment. The reliability, endurance, and communication performance indicators with time variables were selected, and a comprehensive model of the tree structure was established, which could quantify the collaborative factors numerically and objectively reflect the changes in collaborative ability during the platform task process. Based on this, the capability matrix was continuously processed, and the equipment individual was taken as a subsystem. Environmental impact factors were introduced to reflect the influence of the surrounding environment on the equipment performance. An improved ADC model was established for system effectiveness evaluation. By taking the underwater heterogeneous platform composed of autonomous undersea vehicles and communication nodes as an example, the equipment capability and platform effectiveness within the task cycle were evaluated. The research results indicate that this method can be well combined with multiple collaborative factors for effectiveness evaluation, which is feasible and effective and can provide a reference for the effectiveness evaluation of collaborative operation tasks of multi-type equipment.
- underwater heterogeneous platforms,
- autonomous undersea vehicle,
- effectiveness evaluation,
- ADC model,
- capability matrix

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	曹勇, 曹永辉, 黄桥高, 等. 水下仿生扑翼机器人的发展现状综述[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防, 2023, 6(4): 380-405. CAO Y, CAO Y H, HUANG Q G, et al. A review of the underwater bionic flapping wing robots[J]. Digital Ocean and Underwater Warfare, 2023, 6(4): 380-405.
[2]	HUANG H, TANG Q, LI J, et al. A review on underwater autonomous environmental perception and target grasp, the challenge of robotic organism capture[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 195: 106644. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106644
[3]	张延厚, 王超, 张奇, 等. 水声目标探测和识别融合技术发展综述[J]. 信号处理, 2023, 39(10): 1711-1727. ZHANG Y H, WANG C, ZHANG Q, et al. A review of underwater acoustic target detection and recognition technology based on information fusion[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2023, 39(10): 1711-1727.
[4]	苏泓嘉, 罗宇成, 刘飞. 装备体系效能评估及支撑技术综述[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6(3): 29-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4641.2023.03.005 SU H J, LUO Y C, LIU F. Review of equipment effectiveness evaluation and supporting technologies[J]. Air & Space Defense, 2023, 6(3): 29-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4641.2023.03.005
[5]	程恺, 张宏军, 柳亚婷, 等. 作战效能及其评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统科学学报, 2014, 22(1): 91-95. CHENG K, ZHANG H J, LIU Y T, et al. Research on combat effectiveness and evaluation methods[J]. Journal of System Science, 2014, 22(1): 91-95.
[6]	SHAO R, FANG Z, TAO L, et al. A comprehensive G-Lz-ADC effectiveness evaluation model for the single communication satellite system in the context of poor information[J]. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 2022, 12(2): 417-461. doi: 10.1108/GS-03-2021-0030
[7]	孟庆德, 张俊, 魏军辉, 等. 基于ADC法的舰炮武器系统作战效能评估模型[J]. 火炮发射与控制学报, 2015, 36(1): 73-76 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6524.2015.01.016 MENG Q D, ZHANG J, WEI J H, et al. Operational effectiveness evaluation model of naval gun weapon system based on ADC[J]. Journal of Gun Launch & Control, 2015, 36(1): 73-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6524.2015.01.016
[8]	ZHAO Y Q, AN S, MAI Q, et al. Effectiveness modeling of air defense missile weapon system based on ADC method[J]. Systems Engineering & Electronics, 2020, 42(9): 2003.
[9]	徐榕, 吴茂林, 胡平. 改进ADC方法在潜艇作战系统效能评估中的应用[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(8): 141-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.08.023 XU R, WU M L, HU P. Application of improved ADC method for submarine combat system effectiveness assessment[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(8): 141-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2022.08.023
[10]	常会振, 秦大国, 孙盛智, 等. 基于ADC模型优化的海上无人机作战效能评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2023, 44(9): 58-68. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2023.09.008 CHANG H Z, QIN D G, SUN S Z, et al. Operational effectiveness evaluation of marine unmanned aerial vehicle based on ADC model optimization[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2023, 44(9): 58-68. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2023.09.008
[11]	姚群, 舒健生, 王小亮. 信息化条件下反舰作战效能评估指标体系研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2017, 38(5): 48-51. doi: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.05.011 YAO Q, SHU J S, WANG X L. Effectiveness evaluation index system of anti-ship combat under the informationization condition[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2017, 38(5): 48-51. doi: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.05.011
[12]	孟庆玉, 张静远, 宋保维. 鱼雷作战效能分析[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2003.
[13]	欧俊麟. 一种多AUV协同系统搜潜效能研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2019.
[14]	莫军, 李博. 海洋环境对潜艇作战的影响效能[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2011, 32(9): 1-3. MO J, Li B. Effect of ocean environment impact for submarine operation[J]. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2011, 32(9): 1-3.
[15]	莫军, 田亚龙. 海洋环境对水下航行安全影响的综合评估[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2012, 34(10): 89-93. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2012.10.019 MO J, TIAN Y L. The comprehensive assessment about the marine environment on submarine navigation safety influence[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2012, 34(10): 89-93. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2012.10.019
[16]	THOLEN C, NOLLE L, WEWNER J. On the influence of localisation and communication error on the behaviour of a swarm of autonomous underwater vehicles[C]//23rd International Conference on Soft Computing. [S.l.]: Springer, 2017: 68-79.
[17]	杨策, 董理, 张志华, 等. 鱼雷生产定型实航工作可靠度的Bayes评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41(3): 123-126, 131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.03.030 YANG C, DONG L, ZHANG Z H, et al. A Bayesian evaluation method for trial reliability of torpedo production approval[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2016, 41(3): 123-126, 131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.03.030
[18]	宋保维. 鱼雷系统工程原理与方法[M]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 2010.
[19]	MENG J, RICCO M, LUO G, et al. An overview and comparison of online implementable SOC estimation methods for lithium-ion battery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2017, 54(2): 1583-1591.
[20]	高进兴, 陈俊铭, 左添仲. 电池装置的剩余容量与剩余使用时间的估算方法: CN201110048672.6[P]. 2011-09-28.
[21]	LIANG Q, OU J, YAN X, et al. Effect of nodes movement on all-terminal reliability of multi-AUV cooperative system[C]//OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston. Charleston, USA: IEEE, 2018: 1-6.
[22]	孙天元. 多AUV协同系统拓扑结构可靠性研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2014.