Construction and Assessment of Quality Evaluation System for Solving Target Motion Elements

ZHANG Hongrui; LI Bin; CHENG Shuai; KOU Xiaoming

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0109

Volume 32 Issue 4

Aug 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems > 2024 > 32(4): 770-778

ZHANG Hongrui, LI Bin, CHENG Shuai, KOU Xiaoming. Construction and Assessment of Quality Evaluation System for Solving Target Motion Elements[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2024, 32(4): 770-778. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0109

Citation:

ZHANG Hongrui, LI Bin, CHENG Shuai, KOU Xiaoming. Construction and Assessment of Quality Evaluation System for Solving Target Motion Elements[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2024, 32(4): 770-778. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0109

Citation:

PDF( 920 KB)

Construction and Assessment of Quality Evaluation System for Solving Target Motion Elements

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2023-0109

The 705 Research Institute, China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited, Xi’an 710077, China

Received Date: 2023-09-21
Accepted Date: 2024-02-07
Rev Recd Date: 2024-01-30

Available Online: 2024-08-05

Abstract

Abstract

Target tracking is an important part of the anti-submarine warfare process of surface ships. In the process of target tracking, the four elements of targets are obtained through the target motion element solving, and the hit probability is calculated through the result. The solution results of the target motion elements are affected by many factors, such as battlefield situation, detection method, and solution model. In order to associate the separated factor, a quality evaluation system for solving target motion elements was constructed from the four aspects of completeness, availability, timeliness, and accuracy of the solved data. In order to minimize the total deviation, the analytic hierarchy method and entropy weight method were effectively combined to determine the index weight. The quality evaluation value of the target motion elements was obtained by weighted summation and compared with the simulation result of hit probability. The simulation results show that the error between the approximate hit probability and the actual hit probability calculated by using the solved mass is less than 9.2%. The evaluation system constructed in this paper can effectively combine all information, reasonably and fully express the hit probability, and is conducive to the decision-making of the engagement.
- target tracking,
- target motion elements,
- quality evaluation,
- analytic hierarchy process,
- entropy weight method

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	ABDELPAKEY M H, SHEHATA M S. NullSpaceRDAR: Regularized discriminative adaptive nullspace for object tracking[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2022, 127: 61-69.
[2]	金杨. 基于深度学习的机动目标Kalman滤波跟踪算法[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2022.
[3]	梁斌, 高阳, 史晓春. 潜艇与水下无人航行器协同反潜作战运用方法[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2022, 44(10): 102-106. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2022.10.020 LIANG B, GAO Y, SHI X C. Research on collaborative application method of submarine and unmanned underwater vehicle in anti-submarine warfare[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2022, 44(10): 102-106. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2022.10.020
[4]	张安民. 纯方位目标运动分析与鱼雷智能导引律研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2002.
[5]	侯宝娥, 闫雪. 水面舰艇反鱼雷武器系统作战试验要素分析[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2020, 40(4): 13-15, 33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2020.04.004 HOU B E, YAN X. Analysis of operational test elements for shipborne anti-torpedo weapon system[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2020, 40(4): 13-15, 33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2020.04.004
[6]	王凯帅, 孙健, 刘冠杉. 本艇机动对鱼雷武器系统攻击效能的影响分析[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防, 2018, 1(2): 11-15. WANG K S, SUN J, LIU G S. Influence analysis of submarine maneuvering on attack effectiveness of torpedo weapon system[J]. Digital Ocean and Underwater Warfare, 2018, 1(2): 11-15.
[7]	袁富宇, 代志恒, 肖碧琴. 单平台纯方位信息的水面编队目标运动要素解算[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2021, 46(12): 141-148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2021.12.022 YUAN F Y, DAI Z H, XIAO B Q. Calculation of target movement elements of the surface shipformation based on bearing-only information from a single platform[J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2021, 46(12): 141-148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2021.12.022
[8]	程善政, 陈双, 何心怡. 一种目标运动要素纯方位解算方法[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2020, 42(23): 129-132. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2020.12.025 CHENG S Z, CHEN S, HE X Y. A movement parameters calculating method base on bearings-only[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2020, 42(23): 129-132. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2020.12.025
[9]	杨槐, 宫研生. 作战数据在指挥决策中的作用评估方法研究[J]. 兵工自动化, 2012, 31(6): 25-27, 34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1576.2012.06.008 YANG H, GONG Y S. Research on assessment methods of role of combat data in command and decision-making[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2012, 31(6): 25-27, 34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1576.2012.06.008
[10]	刘立军. 作战数据质量模型构建与质量评估[J]. 火炮发射与控制学报, 2017, 38(3): 37-41. LIU L J. Operational data quality model and quality evaluation[J]. Journal of Gun Launch & Control, 2017, 38(3): 37-41.
[11]	张文明, 薛青. 粗糙集方法在作战仿真数据挖掘中的应用[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2006(S2): 179-181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2006.z2.053 ZHANG W M, XUE Q. Application of rough set in date mining of warfare simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2006(S2): 179-181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2006.z2.053
[12]	韩志军, 李锰, 孙少斌. 大型仿真推演系统数据质量评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41(1): 77-80, 84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.01.018 HAN Z J, LI M, SUN S B. Data quality evaluating method of large-scale simulation rehearsal system[J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2016, 41(1): 77-80, 84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.01.018
[13]	杨丽娟, 田铮, 赵伟, 等. 基于变权模型的鱼雷综合性能评估方法[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2014, 22(3): 221-225. YANG L J, TIAN Z, ZHAO W, et al. A method of comprehensive performance evaluation for torpedo based on variable weight model[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2014, 22(3): 221-225.
[14]	王兴隆, 陈仔燕, 刘岩. 基于组合赋权法的空管监视信息质量评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 41-50. WANG X L, CHEN Z Y, LIU Y. Quality assessment of air traffic control surveillance information based on combined empowerment approach[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 41-50.
[15]	宋保维, 李楠, 毛昭勇. 模糊层次分析法在鱼雷作战效能评估中的应用[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2010, 18(4): 249-252. SONG B W, LI N, MAO Z Y. Application of FAHP to torpedo operational effectiveness evaluation[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2010, 18(4): 249-252.
[16]	褚双磊, 魏志强, 任强, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的民用飞机运行需求模糊综合评价[J]. 上海工程技术大学学报, 2021, 35(4): 362-369. CHU S L, WEI Z Q, REN Q, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of civil aircraft operational requirement based on AHP-entropy method[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Engineering Science, 2021, 35(4): 362-369.