Operational Simulation and Efficiency Analysis of Torpedo Electromagnetic Fuse Jammer

LIU Wen-yu; GAO Yong-qi; ZHANG Hong-gang

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.202109017

Volume 30 Issue 4

Sep 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems > 2022 > 30(4): 507-513

LIU Wen-yu, GAO Yong-qi, ZHANG Hong-gang. Operational Simulation and Efficiency Analysis of Torpedo Electromagnetic Fuse Jammer[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2022, 30(4): 507-513. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.202109017

Citation:

LIU Wen-yu, GAO Yong-qi, ZHANG Hong-gang. Operational Simulation and Efficiency Analysis of Torpedo Electromagnetic Fuse Jammer[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2022, 30(4): 507-513. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.202109017

Citation:

PDF( 2163 KB)

Operational Simulation and Efficiency Analysis of Torpedo Electromagnetic Fuse Jammer

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.202109017

College of Weaponry Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China

Received Date: 2021-09-23
Rev Recd Date: 2021-10-06

Available Online: 2022-07-29

Abstract

Abstract

Torpedo electromagnetic fuse jammers are a type of weapon equipment used against wake-homing torpedoes in the wake area of surface ships. The operational parameters of the jammer determine its countering effectiveness. Therefore, to ensure that the torpedo electromagnetic fuse jammer can produce sufficient counter-effectiveness, a operational model for the jammer is built, and simulation research is conducted on the relationship between deployment interval, deployment quantity, operating radius, and success probability of using a torpedo electromagnetic fuse jammer against wake-homing torpedoes. The simulation results show that the use of such jammers can effectively protect surface ships and their operational capabilities, and the three parameters have a significant influence on the success probability of using electromagnetic fuse jammers against wake-homing torpedoes. By analyzing the simulation results, it can be concluded that the best combination of the jammer deployment interval and quantity which satisfying the requirements of the jamming effect can be obtained for a certain operating radius. This research provides a valuable reference for the determination of torpedo electromagnetic fuse jammer performance indexes.
- torpedo,
- electromagnetic fuse jammer,
- efficiency analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(14)

References

[1]	孙振新, 顾天军. 水面舰艇反鱼雷鱼雷拦截策略研究[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2020, 28(6): 699-705. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2020.06.016 Sun Zhen-xin, Gu Tian-jun. Research on Anti-Torpedo Torpedo Interception Strategy of Surface Ship[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2020, 28(6): 699-705. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2020.06.016
[2]	侯宝娥, 田恒斗, 李兵, 等. 悬浮式深弹武器系统对鱼雷拦截能力试验方案设计[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2019, 27(4): 469-472. Hou Bao-e, Tian Heng-dou, Li Bing, et al. Testing Scheme Design on Capability of Hovering Depth Charge Weapon System to Intercept Torpedo[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2019, 27(4): 469-472.
[3]	贾跃, 宋保维, 梁庆卫. 火箭深弹拦截鱼雷方法及作战过程[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2006, 31(3): 41-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2006.03.012 Jia Yue, Song Bao-wei, Liang Qing-wei. Intercepting Torpedo Method and Combat Process of Using Rocket Depth Charges[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2006, 31(3): 41-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2006.03.012
[4]	田恒斗, 金良, 迟卫. 尾流自导鱼雷对抗技术现状与研究[J]. 火力指挥与控制, 2010, 35(10): 36-39. Tian Heng-dou, Jin Liang, Chi Wei. The Status and Prospect of the Countermeasure Against Wake Homing Torpedo[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2010, 35(10): 36-39.
[5]	赵向涛, 孙续文, 周明. 尾流自导鱼雷弹道逻辑仿真[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2009, 17(2): 40-44. Zhao Xiang-tao, Sun Xu-wen, Zhou Ming. Simulation of Trajectory Logic for Wake Homing Torpedo[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2009, 17(2): 40-44.
[6]	董春鹏, 张裕杰, 石小龙. 主动声尾流自导导引过程中信息获取与应用[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2007, 15(3): 15-18. Dong Chun-peng, Zhang Yu-jie, Shi Xiao-long. Acquirement and Application of Information During Guidance of Active Wake Acoustic Homing Torpedo[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2007, 15(3): 15-18.
[7]	董春鹏, 石小龙. 主动声尾流自导鱼雷导引弹道分析计算[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2007, 15(2): 19-23. Dong Chun-Peng, Shi Xiao-Long. Guidance Trajectory Analysis and Calculation for Active Acoustic Wake Homing Torpedo[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2007, 15(2): 19-23.
[8]	陈颜辉, 孙振新. 水面舰艇纯机动规避尾流自导鱼雷方法[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2010, 18(1): 68-71. Chen Yan-hui, Sun Zhen-xin. Eluding Method of Surface Ship Against Wake Homing Torpedo by Tactic Maneuver[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2010, 18(1): 68-71.
[9]	张涛, 任志良, 孙长存, 等. 鱼雷电磁引信接收机对欺骗式干扰抗干扰能力评估[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2011, 19(3): 181-186. Zhang Tao, Ren Zhi-liang, Sun Chang-cun, et al. Evaluation of Anti-interference Capability of Torpedo Electromagnetic Fuze Receiver Against Deceiving Jammings[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2011, 19(3): 181-186.
[10]	张爽, 张晓晖, 孙春生. 一种适于计算舰载激光引偏干扰系统安全引偏距离的冲击因子[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(13): 31-35. Zhang Shuang, Zhang Xiao-hui, Sun Chun-sheng. Impulsive Factor for Safe Distance Calculation of a Ship-based Laser Decoy Jamming System[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(13): 31-35.
[11]	孟庆玉, 张静远, 王鹏, 等. 鱼雷作战效能分析[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2020: 203-204.
[12]	刘朝辉, 赵峰, 槐万景, 等. 基于仿真的深弹拦截鱼雷作战效能评估分析方法[J]. 火力指挥与控制, 2016, 41(1): 41-44. Liu Zhao-hui, Zhao Feng, Huai Wan-jing, et al. Method to Evaluate Operational Effectiveness of Hovering Depth Charge Intercepting Torpedo Based on Simulation[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2016, 41(1): 41-44.
[13]	张洪刚, 王鹏, 张静远. 机动规避条件下尾流自导鱼雷射击瞄点选取方法[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2015, 23(2): 145-149. Zhang Hong-gang, Wang Peng, Zhang Jing-yuan. An Aiming Point Selection Method for Wake Homing Torpedo against Elusive Maneuver[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2015, 23(2): 145-149.
[14]	焦瑜呈. 海水中电磁波特性的分析与研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2018, 38(8): 176-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2018.08.040 Jiao Yu-cheng. Analysis and Research of the Electromagnetic Properties of Seawater[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2018, 38(8): 176-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2018.08.040