拦截弹高海况适应性评估方法

邵宗战; 熊勇; 戴文留

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.202202008

拦截弹高海况适应性评估方法

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.202202008

1.
中国人民解放军91439部队, 辽宁大连, 116041
2.
江南工业集团有限公司, 湖南长沙, 410013

详细信息

作者简介:
邵宗战(1972-), 男, 高级工程师, 主要研究方向为深弹及武器系统试验

中图分类号: TJ412.7; U674.71
计量
- 文章访问数: 57
- HTML全文浏览量: 14
- PDF下载量: 19
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-02-24
- 修回日期: 2022-04-14
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-06

Method of Adaptability Assessment of an Intercept Missile in Challenging Marine Conditions

1.
91439^th Unit, the People’s Liberation Army of China, Dalian 116041, China
2.
Jiangnan Industries Group Co. Ltd., Changsha 410013, China

摘要

摘要: 拦截弹装备于水面舰艇, 其主要使命任务是对来袭的反舰鱼雷实施硬杀伤拦截。工作时, 拦截弹收到系统点火信号后, 发动机点火, 弹体出管飞行; 弹体入水后, 声引信完成分离, 悬浮装置点火, 弹体分离, 气囊充气上浮; 待弹体稳定悬浮后, 开始正常工作。因此, 拦截弹发射飞行及入水分离是否正常是影响其作战效能的关键因素。但在高海况下, 对这些因素的评估存在试验组织实施难、试验产品回收难以及试验数据测量难等一系列实际问题。文中针对该装备的技术特性、使用环境, 提出了拦截弹作战使用需满足的性能要求, 并采用试验验证与仿真计算相结合的综合评估方法, 针对拦截弹的弹道攻角、入水过载和连接件受力3个方面的性能能否满足规定的高海况使用要求进行了研究。结果表明, 上述3方面性能均满足规定的高海况使用要求, 为进一步给出该拦截弹高海况适应性状态鉴定结论提供了技术支撑。
- 拦截弹 /
- 高海况适应性 /
- 评估方法
Abstract: The main mission of an intercept missile equipped on surface warships is to intercept incoming anti-ship torpedoes as a hard-kill countermeasure. After the intercept missile receives the ignition signal from the system, the engine ignites and the body of the intercept missile flies out of the launching tube. When the missile enters water, the acoustic fuse completes separation process by igniting the suspension device to separate the missile body, and the air collar inflates and floats. Finally, the missile body starts to operate normally when it is stably suspended. Therefore, whether the launch, flight, and water-entering separation processes of the intercept missile are normal significantly affects its operational effectiveness. However, there are a series of practical problems concerning the intercept missile test in challenging marine conditions, such as difficulties in organizing and implementing testing, product recovery, and obtaining test data measurement. According to the technical characteristics and operating environment of the equipment, this paper proposes the performance requirements that should be satisfied when using the intercept missile. A comprehensive assessment method combining experimental verification and simulation calculations is proposed for the assessment. Studies regarding whether the attack angle, water-entering overload, and connector stress performance of the intercept missile can satisfy the requirements of challenging marine conditions are described. The results show that the intercept missile can meet the performance requirements of challenging marine conditions in the aforementioned three aspects. The findings can provide technical support for making evaluation conclusions on the adaptability of intercept missiles in challenging marine conditions.
- intercept missile /
- adaptability in challenging marine conditions /
- assessment method

HTML全文

图 1 评估方法框图

Figure 1. Block diagram of the assessment method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 正顺风初始条件弹道攻角幅值曲线

Figure 2. Amplitude curves of angle of attack under initial conditions with positive tailwind

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 正逆风初始条件弹道攻角幅值曲线

Figure 3. Amplitude curves of angle of attack under initial conditions with positive headwind

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 正横风初始条件弹道攻角幅值曲线

Figure 4. Amplitude curves of angle of attack under initial conditions with positive crosswind

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 最大射程击水阶段有限元仿真结果

Figure 5. Finite element simulation results at maximum-range water hitting stage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 最大射程击水阶段过载曲线

Figure 6. Overload curves at maximum-range water hitting stage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 最小射程击水阶段有限元仿真结果

Figure 7. Finite element simulation results at minimum-range water hitting stage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 最小射程击水阶段过载曲线

Figure 8. Overload curves at minimum-range water hitting stage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 最大射程击水阶段后的降速过载曲线

Figure 9. Deceleration overload curves after maximum-range water hitting stage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 最小射程击水阶段后的降速过载曲线

Figure 10. Deceleration overload curves after minimum-range water hitting stage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 $ {\boldsymbol{\varphi = 0}} $时连接件受力图

Figure 11. Force diagram of connector at ${\boldsymbol{ \varphi = 0}} $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 ${\boldsymbol{ \varphi ={\text{π}}/2 }}$时连接件受力图

Figure 12. Force diagram of connector at ${\boldsymbol{ \varphi ={\text{π}}/2}} $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 ${\boldsymbol{ \varphi ={\text{π}} }}$时连接件受力图

Figure 13. Force diagram of connector at ${\boldsymbol{ \varphi = {\text{π}}}} $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 $ {\boldsymbol{\varphi = 7{\text{π}} /4}} $时连接件受力图

Figure 14. Force diagram of connector at $ {\boldsymbol{\varphi = 7{\text{π}}/4}} $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 拦截弹气动稳定性计算结果

Table 1. Results of aerodynamic stability calculation for the intercept missile

序号	弹道攻角/(°)	稳定裕度
1	2	0.250 20
2	4	0.221 00
3	6	0.205 67
4	8	0.197 60
5	10	0.187 53
6	15	0.170 60
7	20	0.167 47
8	25	0.169 13
9	30	0.162 20
10	35	0.146 93
11	40	0.127 80
12	45	0.122 53

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 拦截弹6级海况最大风速条件下弹道入水参数计算结果

Table 2. Calculation results of ballistic water entry parameters under the condition of sea state level 6 and the maximum wind speed

入射角/(°)	入水参数	标准条件	正顺风	正逆风	正横风
45	速度/(m·s⁻¹)	159.5	162.1	155.3	158.5
	弹道倾角/(°)	47.00	46.10	48.40	47.00
	攻角/(°)	0.17	3.70	1.80	3.50
12	速度/(m·s⁻¹)	164.0	165.8	161.9	163.3
	弹道倾角/(°)	12.20	12.10	12.20	12.10
	攻角/(°)	0.50	2.10	1.30	7.40

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(15)

[1]	任磊, 贾跃, 李文哲. 悬浮式拦截弹作战仿真平台的设计与实现[J]. 电子质量, 2017(11): 43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0107.2017.11.011 Ren Lei, Jia Yue, Li Wen-zhe. The Design and Realization of the Suspended Depth-charge Combat Simulation Platform[J]. Electronics Quality, 2017(11): 43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0107.2017.11.011
[2]	刘朝辉, 赵峰, 槐万景, 等. 基于仿真的深弹拦截鱼雷作战效能评估分析方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41(1): 41-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.01.010 Liu Chao-hui, Zhao Feng, Huai Wan-jing, et al. Method to Evaluate Operational Effectiveness of Hovering Depth Charge Intercepting Torpedo Based on Simulation[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2016, 41(1): 41-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.01.010
[3]	李翔, 毕世华, 陈阵. 舰船摇摆下舰载火箭弹初始扰动可能域研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2011, 33(12): 89-92. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2011.12.021 Li Xiang, Bi Shi-hua, Chen Zhen. Research on Presumable Range of Initial Disturbances of Ship-borne Rocket under Ship Swaying Motion[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2011, 33(12): 89-92. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2011.12.021
[4]	任磊, 贾跃, 施帆. 基于相对运动考虑海流影响的拦截弹布放方法[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防, 2019, 2(2): 66-70. Ren Lei, Jia Yue, Shi Fan. Laying Method of Interceptor Considering Ocean Current Influence Based on Relative Motion[J]. Digital Ocean & Underwater Warfare, 2019, 2(2): 66-70.
[5]	孙为康, 史军, 邵文熙, 等. 基于多输入海况条件下的船舶运动模型分析[J]. 价值工程, 2019(36): 220-223. doi: 10.14018/j.cnki.cn13-1085/n.2019.36.094 Sun Wei-kang, Shi Jun, Shao Wen-xi, et al. Analysis of Ship Motion Model Based on Multiple Input Sea Conditions[J]. Value Engineering, 2019(36): 220-223. doi: 10.14018/j.cnki.cn13-1085/n.2019.36.094
[6]	赵峰, 胡伟文, 郭云伟, 等. 悬浮式深弹的射弹散布模型及其精度分析[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2014, 39(1): 33-36. Zhao Feng, Hu Wei-wen, Guo Yun-wei, et al. Impact Area Distribution Model and Accuracy Analysis of Hovering Depth Charge[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2014, 39(1): 33-36.
[7]	赵峰, 胡伟文, 朱朝峰, 等. 悬浮式深弹拦截鱼雷作战效能的因素分析[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2013, 25(6): 18-23. Zhao Feng, Hu Wei-wen, Zhu Chao-feng, et al. Analysis of Factors Affecting Operational Effectiveness of Hovering Depth Charge in Intercepting Torpedo[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2013, 25(6): 18-23.
[8]	陈俊锋, 朱军, 黄昆仑. 规则波浪中舰船不规则摇荡运动计算分析[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2011, 33(1): 41-44. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2011.01.007 Chen Jun-feng, Zhu Jun, Huang Kun-lun. Study on the Irregular Oscillatory Motions for a Ship in Regular Waves[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2011, 33(1): 41-44. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2011.01.007
[9]	韩子鹏. 弹箭外弹道学[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012.
[10]	孙慧玲, 胡伟文, 宋业新. 悬浮式深水炸弹综合防御鱼雷作战仿真系统确认方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(12): 2523-2529. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.12.018 Sun Hui-ling, Hu Wei-wen, Song Ye-xin. Accreditation Method for Integrated Anti-torpedo Combat Simulation System of Suspended Depth Charge[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(12): 2523-2529. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.12.018
[11]	姚奉亮, 贾跃, 丁贝. 悬浮式深弹拦截不确定型鱼雷作战模型研究[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2011, 19(1): 63-67. Yao Feng-liang, Jia Yue, Ding Bei. Operational Model for Intercepting Uncertain Type of Torpedo with Hovering Depth Charge[J]. Torpedo Technology, 2011, 19(1): 63-67.
[12]	Meng J, Wang Y J, Cai L, et al. Research on the Combination of Underwater Acoustic Countermeasure Equipment against Torpedo[C]//International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Systems. Paris: EDP Sciences, 2016.
[13]	吴海平, 袁志勇, 张翼超. 悬浮式拦截弹拦截鱼雷概率分析[J]. 船电技术, 2009, 29(4): 26-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4862.2009.04.007 Wu Hai-ping, Yuan Zhi-yong, Zhang Yi-chao. The Probability of Intercepting Torpedo Using Suspended Depth Charge[J]. Marine Electric Electronic Engineering, 2009, 29(4): 26-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4862.2009.04.007
[14]	房毅, 田恒斗, 侯宝娥. 悬浮式深弹反鱼雷武器仿真试验系统设计[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2016, 37(6): 79-82. doi: 10.11809/scbgxb2016.06.019 Fang Yi, Tian Heng-dou, Hou Bao-e. Simulation Test System Design of Hovering Depth Charge Anti-Torpedo Weapon[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2016, 37(6): 79-82. doi: 10.11809/scbgxb2016.06.019
[15]	任磊, 贾跃, 李文哲. 舰载软硬防雷武器综合对抗智能鱼雷方案研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(12): 2336-2341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.12.017 Ren Lei, Jia Yue, Li Wen-zhe. Research on Comprehensive Scheme of Shipboard Hard and Soft Torpedo Defense Weapons against Intelligent Torpedoes[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(12): 2336-2341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.12.017