装药深度及空气域尺寸对水下爆炸的影响分析

刘世聪; 王秋生; 娄浩然

doi:10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2019.06.010

装药深度及空气域尺寸对水下爆炸的影响分析

doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2019.06.010

北京工业大学建筑工程学院, 北京, 100124

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(51339006); 北京市科委重点项目资助(Z161100002216001)

详细信息

作者简介:
刘世聪(1993-), 男, 硕士, 主要研究方向为水下爆炸研究.

中图分类号: TJ630; TV542.5
计量
- 文章访问数: 399
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 246
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-04-12
- 修回日期: 2019-05-16
- 刊出日期: 2019-12-31

Effects of Charge Depth and Air Domain Size on Underwater Explosion

College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

摘要

摘要: 在水下爆炸试验中, 很难开展针对装药深度及影响数值计算精度的空气域尺寸研究, 因此, 数值仿真就成为研究水下爆炸的重要手段。文中基于离心机水下爆炸试验, 利用二维、三维模型对超重力场下的球形炸药水下爆炸进行仿真, 并与试验结果进行对比, 验证了所建模型的合理性。在2个模型的基础上, 同时建立具有不同装药深度及空气域尺寸的模型, 以研究两者对水下爆炸冲击波及气泡脉动数值仿真结果的影响。研究表明: 装药深度越大, 距离炸药中心相同测距处的冲击波峰值越大, 但峰值随装药深度的增幅并不明显; 空气域尺寸大小对水下爆炸气泡脉动计算影响也很小。
- 水下爆炸 /
- 数值仿真 /
- 装药深度 /
- 空气域尺寸
Abstract: In underwater explosion test, it is difficult to carry out research on the charge depth and the air domain size which affects the accuracy of numerical calculation. In this paper, based on the underwater explosion test of centrifuge, underwater explosion of spherical explosive under super-gravity field is simulated using two-dimensional and three-dimensional models, and the simulation results are compared with the test data to verify the rationality of the two models. Then, different charge depth and air domain size are added to the two models to analyze the effects of the two factors on simulation results of underwater explosion shock wave and bubble pulsation. The simulation results show that the greater the charge depth, the larger the shock wave peak values at the same distance from the center of the explosive, but the increase rate of the peak value with the charge depth is small; and the air domain size has little effect on numerical results of the underwater explosion bubble pulsation.
- underwater explosion /
- numerical simulation /
- charge depth /
- air domain size

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	Snay H G. Hydrodynamics of Underwater Explosions[C]//Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics 1st, Washiton D C, USA. 1956: 325-352.
[2]	Cole R H. Underwater Explosions[M]. New Jersey: Prin- ceton University Press, 1948.
[3]	Brett J M, Buckland M, Turner T, et al. An Experimental Facility for Imaging of Medium Scale Underwater Explosions DSTO-TR-1432[R]. Australian: Defence Science and Technology Organisation, 2003.
[4]	黄超, 汪斌, 姚熊亮, 等. 试验室尺度水下爆炸气泡试验方法[J]. 传感器与微系统, 2011, 30(12): 75-77, 81. Huang Chao, Wang Bin, Yao Xiong-liang, et al. Laboratory-scale Underwater Explosion Bubble Experiment Method[J]. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies, 2011, 30(12): 75-77, 81.
[5]	Benjamin T B, Ellis A T. The Collapse of Cavitation Bubbles and the Pressures Thereby Produced Against Solid Boundaries[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1966, 260(1110): 221-240.
[6]	Tomita Y, Shima A, Takahashi K. The Collapse of a Gas Bubble Attached to a Solid Wall by a Shock Wave and the Induced Impact Pressure[J]. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1983, 105(3): 341-347.
[7]	Zhang A M, Li S, Cui J, et al. Study on Splitting of a Toroidal Bubble Near a Rigid Boundary[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27(6): 062102.
[8]	张阿漫, 王超, 王诗平, 等．气泡与自由液面相互作用的试验研究[J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61(8): 1-13. Zhang A-man, Wang Chao, Wang Shi-ping, et al. Experimental Study of Interaction Between Bubble and Free Surface[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(8): 1-13.
[9]	范一锴, 陈祖煜, 梁向前, 等. 砂中爆炸成坑的离心模型试验分析方法比较[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(S2): 4123-4128. Fan Yi-kai, Chen Zu-yu, Liang Xiang-qian, et al. Comp- arison of Three Methods for Geotechnical Centrifuge Model Tests of Explosion Cratering Sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(S2): 4123-4128.
[10]	Holsapple K A, Schmidt R M. On the Scaling of Crater Dimensions 1. Explosive Processes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1980, 85(B12): 7247- 7256.
[11]	Hu J, Chen Z Y, Wang Q S, et al. Underwater Explosion in Centrifuge PartⅠ: Validation and Calibration of Scaling Law[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2017, 60 (11): 1638-1657.
[12]	Long Y, Zhou H Y, Liang X Q, et al. Underwater Explosion in Centrifuge Part II: Dynamic Responses of Defensive Steel Plate[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2017, 60(12): 1941-1957.
[13]	Wu J Y, Long Y, Zhong M S, et al. Centrifuge Experiment and Numerical Study on the Dynamic Response of Air-backed Plate to Underwater Explosion[J]. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2017, 19(7): 5231-5247.
[14]	Song G, Chen Z Y, Long Y, et al. Experiment and Numerical Investigation of the Centrifugal Model for Underwater Explosion Shock Wave and Bubble Pulsation[J], Ocean Engineering, 2017, 142(15): 523-531.
[15]	娄浩然, 胡晶, 梁向前, 等. 超重力场下球形炸药水下爆炸试验及数值模拟[J]. 工程爆破, 2017, 23(3): 15- 21. Lou Hao-ran, Hu Jing, Liang Xiang-qian, et al. Underwater Explosion Experiment and Numerical Simulation of Spherical Explosives Under Hypergravity Field[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2017, 23(3): 15-21.
[16]	王树乐, 陈高杰, 沈晓乐, 等. 基于并行计算的某战斗部中近场毁伤能力仿真研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(S1): 298-302. Wang Shu-le, Chen Gao-jie, Shen Xiao-le, et al. A Numerical Study of Warhead Damage Based on Parallel Computing in Near-field[J]. Acta Armamentarh, 2015, 36(S1): 298-302.
[17]	徐豫新, 王树山, 李园. 水下爆炸数值仿真研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2009, 29(6): 95-97, 102. Xu Yu-xin, Wang Shu-shan, Li Yuan. Study on Numerical Simulation of The Underwater explosion[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2009, 29(6): 95-97, 102.
[18]	张效慈. 水下爆炸试验相似准则[J]. 船舶力学, 2007, 11(1): 108-118. Zhang Xiao-ci. Similarity Criteria for Experiment of Underwater Explosion[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2007, 11(1): 108-118.
[19]	Century Dynamic Inc. AUTODYN Theory Manual Version 4.3[M]. USA: Century Dynamic Inc, 2005.
[20]	韩早, 王伯良. 混合炸药爆速的新方法[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(4): 421-426. Han Zao, Wang Bo-liang. A New Method for Predicting Detonation Velocity of Composite Explosive[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(4): 421-426.
[21]	Johansson C H, Persson P A. Density and Pressure in the Chapman-Jouguet Plane as Functions of Initial Density of Explosives[J]. Nature, 1996, 212(5067): 1230-1231.
[22]	Urtiew P A, Hayes B. Parametric Study of the Dynamic JWL-EOS for Detonation Products[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves. 1991, 27(4): 505-514.
[23]	Urtiew P A, Hayes B. Parametric Study of the Dynamic JWL EOS for Detonation Products[J]. Combustion Explosion and Shock Waves, 1991, 27(4): 504-514．
[24]	孙承纬, 卫玉章, 周之奎. 应用爆轰物理[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2000.
[25]	Urtiew P A, Hayes B. Empirical Estimate of Detonation Parameters in Condensed Explosives[J]. Journal of Energetic Materials, 1991, 9(4): 297-318.
[26]	Gel’fand B E, Takayama K. Similarity Criteria for Underwater Explosions[J]. Combustion Explosion & Shock Waves, 2004, 40(2): 214-218.
[27]	杨坤, 陈朗, 伍俊英, 等. 计算网格与人工粘性系数对炸药水中爆炸数值模拟计算的影响分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(S2): 237-243. Yang Kun, Chen Lang, Wu Jun-ying, et al. The Effects of Computing Grid and Artificial Viscosity Coefficient on Underwater Explosion Numerical Simulation[J]. Acta Armamenth, 2014, 35(S2): 237-243.